Book Review: “Richie Doodles,” A Motion Painting Mass Close Richard Feynman Past Times M. J. Mouton As Well As J. S. Cuevas
Rare Bird Books (February 20, 2018)
I’m weak. I accept a difficult fourth dimension maxim “no” when offered a complimentary book. And every bit the pile grows, hence does my guilt for non reading them. So when I was offered a complimentary re-create of a moving-picture exhibit majority close Richard Feynman, of course of written report I said “yes.” I’d write around overnice words, locomote off around guilt, as well as everyone would live happy. How difficult could it be?
So the majority arrived as well as I handed it to the twins, that existence my slap-up excogitation reviewing a children’s book. I don’t mean value the kids understood why individual would give them a majority for complimentary exactly to withdraw heed whether they liked it, but as well as then I’m non solely certain I empathize the review concern myself.
In whatsoever case, my zero-effort review failed at the kickoff hurdle, that existence that the majority is inwards English linguistic communication but the twins barely exactly read German. So “mommy, read!” it was. Except that of course of written report reading wouldn’t accept done because, a grand hours of Peppa Pig notwithstanding, they don’t empathize much English linguistic communication either.
I am telling you lot this hence you lot tin give notice properly justice the circumstances nether which this, cough, review was conducted. It was me translating English linguistic communication poesy on the fly. Oh, yes, the majority is inwards verse. Which you lot powerfulness notice giddy but I tin give notice attest, that 7 twelvemonth olds mean value it’s the best.
The translation occupation was fairly tardily to solve – I fifty-fifty managed a rhyme hither as well as in that place – but the side past times side occupation wasn’t. Turns out that the majority doesn’t accept a plot. It is a serial of pictures loosely connected to the text, but it has no storyline. At to the lowest degree I couldn’t notice one. There’s a domestic dog named “Hitch” which appears throughout the “Tiny Thinkers” serial (so far 3 books), but the domestic dog is non introduce on most pages. And fifty-fifty if it’s on the page, it’s non clear why or what it’s doing.
That absence of even was around disappointment. Not similar first-graders are demanding when it comes to storytelling. “The domestic dog stole the doodle as well as the truthful cat flora it” would accept done. But no plot.
Ok, well, hence I made upwards a plot. Something along the lines that everyone idea Richie was exactly crazy doing all the doodles but turned out he was a genius. No, I don’t excogitation making career amongst this.
The side past times side occupation I encountered is that the illustrations are every bit awesome every bit the text isn’t. They are professionally done cartoon-style drawings (four-fingered hands as well as all) amongst a lovely attending to detail. The special headache they gave me is that inwards several images a miss appears and, naturally, my daughters were much to a greater extent than interested inwards who the miss is as well as what she is doing rather than what the boy’s squiggly lines accept to attain amongst tau neutrinos. Maybe Richie’s sister? The majority leaves ane guessing.
The final occupation appeared on the lastly page, where nosotros watch an angry looking (female) math instructor reprimanding a real smug looking man child (we aren’t told who that is) for drawing doodles instead of paying attending to the teacher. The text says “If your instructor sees you lot doodling inwards class, as well as says those giddy drawings won’t aid you lot pass… You tin give notice explicate that your doodle isn’t giddy at all. It’s called a Feynman Diagram explaining things that are small.”
I wasn’t amused. Please understand. I accept a degree. I can’t mayhap tell my kids it’s ok to ignore their math instructor because maybe their drawings volition ane 24-hour interval revolutionize the world.
So I turned this into an explanation close how math isn’t simply close numbers as well as calculus, but to a greater extent than mostly close relations that can, amidst others, live represented past times drawings. I ended upwards giving a two-hour lecture on braid groups as well as laid theory.
The majority finishes amongst around biographical notes close Feynman.
On Amazon, the majority is marked for Kindergardners, historic catamenia 4-6. But to fifty-fifty brand feel of the images, the children demand to know what an atom is, what mathematics is, as well as what a microscope is. The text is fifty-fifty to a greater extent than demanding: It contains phrases similar “quark as well as antiquark pair” as well as speaks of particles that repel or attract, as well as hence on.
Because of this I’d accept guessed the majority is aimed at children historic catamenia 7 to 10. Or maybe to a greater extent than specifically at children of physicists. Of course of written report I don’t await a moving-picture exhibit majority to genuinely explicate how Feynman diagrams work, but the text inwards the majority is hence confused I can’t watch how a kid tin give notice brand feel of it without an adult who genuinely knows that stuff.
At around point, for example, the text raises the impression that all particles transcend through affair without interaction. “Things hence pocket-size they transcend correct through walls!” You accept to facial expression at the illustration on the contrary page to figure out this refers only to neutrinos (which are non named inwards the text). If you lot don’t already know what neutrinos are, you’ll cease upwards real confused which collisions the after pages refer to.
Another peculiar thing close the majority is that too the “doodles” it says pretty much null close Richard Feynman. Bongo drums appear hither as well as in that place but are non mentioned inwards the text. Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 doodle-painted van tin give notice live spotted, but is only referred to inwards the biography. There is also what seems to live an illustration of Schrödinger’s truthful cat experiment as well as after a “wanted” poster looking for the truthful cat “dead or alive.” Cute, yes, but that too is disconnected from the text.
I got the impression the majority is genuinely aimed at children of physicists – or maybe exactly physicists themselves? – who tin give notice fill upwards inwards the details. And no give-and-take of lock-picking!
As you lot tin give notice tell, I wasn’t excited. But as well as then the majority wasn’t for me. When I asked the girls for their impression, they said they liked the majority because it’s “funny.” Further question revealed that what’s funny close the majority are the illustrations. There’s a domestic dog walking through a bucket of paint, leaving behind footprints. That scored highly, permit me tell you. There’s a automobile accident (a scattering event), an apple tree amongst a worm inside, as well as a identify unit of measurement of mice living inwards a hole inwards the wall. There are also flight noodles as well as fifty-fifty I haven’t figured out what those are, which made them the funniest thing inwards the globe ever, at to the lowest degree for what my children are concerned.
The majority has a foreword past times Lawrence Krauss, but since Krauss lately moved to the sinner’s corner, that powerfulness plough out to live to a greater extent than of a attain goodness for Krauss than for the book.
In summary, the illustrations are awesome, the explanations aren’t.
I experience similar I should live grateful individual produces children’s books close physics at all. Then ane time again I’m non grateful plenty to settle for mediocrity.
Really, why anyone asks me to review books is beyond me.
Comments
Post a Comment